|
Q: What
does "the transfer of UCSD innovations for the public benefit"
in your first mission statement really mean?
A: In order to benefit the public, UCSD innovations must
be turned into useful products or services that the public
can use. Our mission mandates that we partner with entities
that have a genuine interest in, and the capability to develop,
our innovations into such products or services. Conversely,
if companies are interested in licensing our innovations only
to keep them away from competition, we would not license our
innovations to them.
Q: How
does TechTIPS enhance the research experience of UCSD researchers
through technology transfer?
A: By properly managing intellectual property (IP) disclosed
to us by our researchers, we can enhance their experience
in many ways, including:
1. By licensing the IP to a commercial entity, TechTIPS may
be able to leverage the license to secure additional funding
for the researcher;
2. Our licensees may wish to engage our researchers as "advisors"
to advise them how best to develop the IP into useful products.
Such advising activities enhance our researchers' vision of
how applicable their research may be in real life and beyond
the academic environment;
3. Our licensees may want to collaborate with our researchers;
4. Our researchers may learn from our licensees and potential
licensees how academic research may be applied to real life
practices; and
5. Our licensees may provide employment opportunities for
our graduate students and post-docs.
Q: What
does TechTIPS do to promote and target economic development?
A: TechTIPS focuses its initial marketing efforts on local
companies and entrepreneurs. To the extent our local businesses
can use our innovations gainfully to develop useful products
and services, they become our preferred customers. For innovations
that are suitable for the formation of new businesses, we
work with entrepreneurs to establish new companies in the
area. These new companies attract investment dollars into
our community, create new high-wage jobs, attract secondary
service providers and help to establish a knowledge-based
economy in San Diego. Historically, more than one-third of
our licenses are granted to companies in the greater San Diego
area.
Q: What
does "provide financial incentives to researchers" mean in
your mission statement?
A: When we license UCSD intellectual property (IP) to commercial
entities, TechTIPS strives to negotiate a reasonable consideration
that reflects the fair market value of the licensed IP created
by our researchers. Under UC policies, the researchers who
created the IP would then receive either an inventor share
or an author share of the consideration as their personal
income. Additionally, UCSD distributes a portion of the consideration
received from licensing back to the researchers' laboratories
and home departments to support further research activities.
Q: How many new disclosures of intellectual property
does TechTIPS receive per year?
A: TechTIPS has been receiving over 300 new disclosures (about
90% inventions and 10% copyrights) per year in the last 5
fiscal years. This high level of activities genuinely reflects
the innovative culture and proclivity of our researchers.
Quick Facts
Q: How is TechTIPS structured?
A: TechTIPS is part of the university (not a separate foundation
or a corporation independent of the university) and reports
to the Vice Chancellor for Research. Vice
Chancellor-Research Organization Chart
Q: How many people work at TechTIPS?
A: TechTIPS has a staff of under 30 people. There are 10
licensing professionals in our Licensing & Liaisons Group,
7 in life sciences and 3 in physical sciences. They work directly
with UCSD researchers and are responsible for marketing and
licensing our innovations to industry for commercial development.
In addition to the Licensing and Liaisons Group, we have three
other groups that contribute to our '4-Wheel Drive' model
of intellectual property services at TechTIPS. These other
groups are the Policy, Outreach, and Disclosure Service Group
(PODS), the Patent/Intellectual Property Group, and the Finance
& Operations Group. TechTIPS
Organization Chart
PODS is responsible for docket establishment, sponsor reporting,
policy compliance, and organizing and staging our outreach
activities.
The Patent/Intellectual Property Group is responsible for
all patent prosecution, copyright registration, and trademark
registration activities.
The Finance & Operations Group is responsible for contract
compliance, accounting (this includes collecting royalties
and fees and distributing them to our researchers and their
academic departments), information systems, and general operations
of TechTIPS.
Q: What is the background of TechTIPS licensing
staff?
A: All of the licensing professionals have technical backgrounds.
They have hands-on experience in technology management and/or
in industrial product or business development. Biographies
of the licensing professionals with additional details about
their technical or business areas of expertise can be found
on our website
by clicking on the licensing professional's name.
Q: Whom do I contact at TechTIPS with questions
about inventions or intellectual property?
A: If you've worked with TechTIPS before, contact the licensing
professional previously assigned to serve you. If you haven't
worked with TechTIPS yet, send an email to invent@ucsd.edu
and an appropriate professional will contact you.
Q: Does TechTIPS have a patent attorney or do
they use outside attorneys or patent agents?
A: Although TechTIPS has several certified patent professionals
on its staff, it retains external attorneys and agents to
draft and prosecute our patent applications. This approach
allows us to choose the law firms with the proper expertise
that best match the need of our specific inventions that we
want to patent. TechTIPS works with a number of patent firms
throughout the country and they are all pre-qualified by the
General Counsel Office in the UC Office of the President.
Q: Do I have to disclose all my inventions to
TechTIPS?
A: If you receive a paycheck from the university, use any
university research facilities, or receive funding through
the university, you
have to disclose all your inventions to TechTIPS regardless
of whether you believe UC should own them.
Q: If I want to find out what has happened to
an invention I disclosed earlier, what should I do?
A: There are two easy ways -
1. Go to the TechTIPS
website and log on using your password-protected Inventor
Portal. Once you have successfully logged on, it will provide
you a summary of the status of all your disclosures; or
2. Just call the licensing professional (licensing officer)
assigned to serve you.
If don't remember your assigned licensing professional, just
drop us an email at invent@ucsd.edu
Q: What is a patent?
A: A patent is a time-limited monopoly, granted by the government,
to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering for
sale, or importing your invention. It does not grant you the
affirmative rights to your own invention, as other parties
may have other but related patents to exclude you also.
Q: What and who determines if an invention is
patentable?
A: An invention is patentable if it is novel, not obvious
to any one who is considered skillful in the field of your
invention, and has utility. It must also teach how the invention
can be practiced such that others who are considered skillful
in the field of your invention can use the invention without
undue experimentation. Ultimately, it is the patent examiner
in the patent office who will determine whether an invention
sufficiently satisfies the above requirements and allows a
patent to be issued.
Q: Who owns a patent?
A: Said inventor usually owns the patent of its invention.
However, by contracts and by common laws (employer-employee
relation), the employers usually own the patents of inventions
created by their employees by assignment. At the University
of California, all employees sign a Patent
Agreement or a Patent
Acknowledgement Form when they first join the university.
These agreements generally confer ownership rights of patents
on inventions created by UC employees to the Regents of the
University of California except under a few specified circumstances.
Q: What should I do if I want to send research
materials to other researchers?
A: Instructions and forms are available at the Material Transfer Process website.
Q: Can I receive materials from the outside and
into UCSD?
A: Instructions and forms are available at the Material Transfer Process website.
Q: Can you tell me about guidelines for ownership
and copyright of lectures that are taped? Is the faculty member
the owner of this material or does he share intellectual property
rights with the university?
A: Who owns the copyright of taped lectures will depend on (i)
whose initiative it is to tape the lecture, and (ii) what resource
is used. For example, if the lecture is taped under the lecturer's
own initiative and with NO use of university resources, then
the lecturer owns the copyright. If the taping uses university
resources such as using fund received from or provided by the
university, then the university owns the copyright. If the taping
is done under the university's initiative with permission of
the lecturer, then the university owns the copyright unless
as a condition of granting the permission to tape, the lecturer
specifically demands to have ownership of the copyright. A more
detailed description of the UC Policy regarding this matter
can be found at
http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/coordrev/policy/9-25-03policy.pdf
Q: If I developed some work with copyright that
is owned by the university, but I want to allow other universities
to use my work and the copyright for not-for-profit purposes
freely, is it allowed?
A: Yes. You can contact TechTIPS and we have a simple one page
"shrink-wrap
permission" statement that you need to send to the
prospective recipient university
Q: If the work is a software program and I just
want to post it on the Internet and allow potential users
to download it for not-for-profit uses without all the paperwork,
is it allowed?
A: Yes. We have a similar "click-wrap
statement" that you can post on or before the first
page of your downloadable program.
Q: Why do we bother with the "permission"
statement since it is free anyway?
A: It is not all about money. To protect yourself and the
university, the permission statement contains several important
legal statements that
(i) disclaim any implied or express warranty;
(ii) disclaim any liability that may arise from the use of
the program; and
(iii) require the users to acknowledge the copyright is owned
by The Regents of the University of California in order to
satisfy the requirement for continuing ownership by the university.
Q: Does the university allow open source release
of software?
A: Although it is not the university's preferred or default
practice because of the "viral" or "infectious"
nature that requires all downstream derivative work to continue
release in the same manner, UCSD does allow open source release
but only if the following conditions are met:
- All developers/authors involved consent to the request
in writing;
- No conflicting sponsor obligations (e.g. DFAR); and
- All developers/authors agree in writing that they would
not pursue any personal financial benefits from activities
related to the use of the open source released software
(to be in compliance with conflict of interest regulations).
Additionally, the ability to police and enforce the contractual
obligations under open source release is also highly debatable.
There are several types of licenses available for the release
of software under open source. UCSD will, to the extent possible,
use the BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution) license because
it does not have many of the additionally restrictive and unstably
evolving nature of the ever-changing versions of the GPL licenses.
The latest proposed version of the GPL
is also in conflict with UC policies governing patents
and copyrights.
Q: I am a staff employee (non-faculty) and do not work in a research role. But I am curious if UC (OP, Regents, SD, etc.) have the intellectual property rights to any ideas (for a business, product, etc.) that I have while employed by the University?
A: That depends on (i) the specific job functions the staff employee is hired to perform at UC, (ii) how the intellectual property to which the intellectual property rights subsist relates to those job functions, and (iii) whether resources from UC are used in the conception, development, or creation of the subject intellectual property. The UC intellectual property policies apply to all UC employees and not only to employees with a research role. For example, if you are hired as a staff architectural designer, your work product as well as the copyrights that subsist in your designs belong to UC although you have no research role. The determination of whether UC has the intellectual property rights to any ideas therefore is very fact and circumstance specific. A full disclosure to TechTIPS of the intellectual property will allow such a determination be made in a timely manner.
Q: I am currently participating in the $50K [business plan competition] program where UCSD students present their own new ideas to a judging board. The idea that my group and I have is closely related to a current patent, but still has distinctive differences.
I was wondering how novelty can be established and how I might go about
determining this. . .
A: Novelty is a legal determination based on patent law; and the only entities that may provide you with a definitive determination are the patent office (for the purpose of allowing and issuing a patent - in the US, it is the US Patent & Trademark Office) and the courts (for the purpose of litigation to settle disputes). In general, there are two basic elements that may negate novelty and they are: publication and obviousness. If neither you nor anybody else has published the idea, then the applicable criterion is obviousness. The question one will have to ask then is "are the distinctive differences not obvious from the current patent and other publications in the eyes of a person who is skilled in the art"? There is not a black and white answer to this. The obviousness analysis for any patent application that you may decide to apply for is highly dependent on the viewpoint of the patent examiner who processes the patent application or the judges who rule in the courts, if your idea results in a patent but is challenged. During the patent prosecution process, there may be "office actions" back and forth allowing the patent applicant(s) to submit arguments and affidavits etc. to persuade the patent examiner. During a court trial, similar evidence may also be presented to persuade the court. Although the professionals at TechTIPS are knowledgeable in patent law and can provide you their advice on the novelty of your idea, they cannot make the official determination.
Q: Is there a UCSD biotech incubator?
A: No, currently UCSD does not have a biotech incubator. There is at least one local biotech incubator sponsored by a large pharmaceutical company. Even in the absence of a formal incubator at UCSD, since 1994 our entrepreneurial researchers have been involved in, or formed, over 100 new startup companies that have licensed university technologies in the biotech or hi-tech fields. TechTIPS licenses technologies to local startups and companies, as well as those in other regions of the country and world, and can provide contacts to local business networks for our partners.
TechTIPS manages a large portfolio of technologies and we welcome the opportunity to work with you on licensing a technology that may be suitable for your business needs. Our available biomedical technologies are listed at http://invent.ucsd.edu/technology/biomedical.htm.
|